What Makes Leftists So “Sure?”

Have you ever wondered why seemingly intelligent people can appreciate minute details and display scrupulous effort toward preventive measures in a selective manner only?

First, for the sake of convention, can we agree that the term Leftist is synonymous with Liberal, Progressive, perpetual adolescent?

They (Leftists) can tolerate some situations but not others. They are compassionate toward one demographic but not another. (Not via objective analysis, but out of subjective desire) Like the classic immature, hormone-driven pubescent male, they reason with their Johnsons. But they portray themselves as sensitive to the cause of feminism. They persuade women they are not porn-addicted male chauvinist pigs, but champions of a woman’s right? to choose. As lame as the "painful" unattended erection ruse, access to chemical abortifacients (both pre and post), and abortion-on-demand "for women’s equality," is nothing more than their selfish obsession to maintain an abundant pool of uninhibited sex partners.

How else could one explain the lapse in a male’s prowess in logic? Safety-mindedness, bordering on the compulsive, is manifested at every turn when the subject of concern is a born child. School buses and the sacred aura surrounding them are no less than holy ground. With every incidence of injury or near-disaster comes an ever-increasing layer of regulation that anticipates all future dangers. The buses themselves went from merely yellow to incorporating flashing lights, swing-out stop signs and barriers, reflective tape, and eye-piercing strobes. They stop at railroad crossings and open the door (for as long as it takes the driver to quiet the kids) before proceeding across the tracks. If the bus is empty (so other drivers don’t become unaccustomed to revering safety measures) the bus must continue the ritual. School crossing zones require similar obsessions to the extent of crossing guards keeping traffic on the already traversed side of the median waiting while even one (lethargic) student crosses the second expanse. Again, this is not done out of direct safety, but to maintain an extra layer of vigilance (behavioral-training) so that the general population will not grow lax on safety-mindedness.

We could go on with examples of childrens’ protective services and legislation to assuage pedophile paranoia but let the school buses speak to the issue. Suffice it to say we err on the side of extreme caution when it comes to the safety of born children. Does the alleged apple instantaneously and arbitrarily become an alleged orange as "it" presents "itself" at birth? Kermit Gosnell is an example of an intellectually honest Leftist who had the audacity and faux-pas-simplicity to neglect the so-called "difference." He blatantly and unapologetically "crossed the arbitrary line." Pro-abort apologists argue that he did so out of compassion for a low-income woman’s right? to choose. Why then did he charge such exorbitant prices without reinvesting in even the minimal "quality" of his facilities for the women he purported to care about?

By contrast, those squeamish about the slaughter and gore produced by a train smashing a school bus are unfazed by the documented details of how to kill a full term baby "legally" with precision ("partial-birth" murder). Kermit was inept at pre-killing the pre-born prior to labor and delivery. He couldn’t master the technique of administering an injection of digoxin to the hearts of the pre-born babies. Furthermore, radical feminists and other Leftists feel no remorse that quite-recognizable severed pieces of earlier pre-borns must be reassembled in order to pragmatically assure that none is left behind to fester in the mother’s cleansed womb.

What gives with Leftists’ dramatic discrepancy in logic between born and pre-born children? The devil is in the details. They only observe scientific detail when it serves their groins. They go to great lengths to err on the side of caution for alleged safety of women and certain-aged children. But where is that willingness to err on the side of caution for the right to life of human posterity, let alone the resultant inhumane torture of innocents? At every turn, at every moment from fertilization to post-birth, they play the devil’s advocate that a person may not exist. Why aren’t they as scrupulous with the possibility, if not probability, that humanity and thus personhood begins with DNA haploid fusion of an original diploid human organism – the biological inception of human life?

Why?

Because Progressives think with their dicks.